Violation codePay, fees & earnings rules

TLC Rule 82-17(g)(2): SHL Improvement Surcharge Summons

Rule 82-17(g)(2) covers the $1 Street Hail Livery Improvement Surcharge, and its wording changed over the years. What each version meant; $1,000 penalty.

  • Reviewed
  • 3 min read
  • 4 official sources

TLC rule

§82-17(g)(2)
Appearance required
Penalty
Current rule book (Feb. 2026): $1,000 and suspension until compliance for 82-17(g)(1)–(5), appearance required. January 2019 rule book: $1,000 for 82-17(g)(1)–(3),
Points
—
Type
License, insurance & documents
Official text
TLC rule book
On this page (9)
  1. The money behind this rule
  2. What (g)(2) said, then and now
  3. How often it appears
  4. Who it applies to
  5. What to do now
  6. Hearing, payment and suspension
  7. Points to discuss with your lawyer
  8. FAQ
  9. Sources

In short: Rule 82-17(g) is about money for accessibility: the $1.00 Street Hail Livery Improvement Surcharge added to every hail trip in a green "Boro Taxi," which goes into a City fund that supports wheelchair-accessible SHLs and their drivers. A summons under 82-17(g)(2) says a payment duty in that system wasn't met. The penalty is $1,000 with appearance required. Because the wording of (g)(2) changed over the years, the first step is to find out which version your summons relies on.

The money behind this rule

TLC's definitions chapter explains the pieces:

  • Street Hail Livery Improvement Surcharge: "the surcharge of $1.00 per trip that will be added to every Hail Trip in a Street Hail Livery." It goes into the Fund, "except for any amounts paid directly to the Drivers of Accessible Street Hail Liveries."
  • Street Hail Livery Improvement Fund: a City-managed fund that makes subsidy payments to SHL licensees who must buy an accessible vehicle and to drivers who operate accessible SHLs, and can fund driver training and the accessible dispatch program.

Chapter 82 says the surcharge must be collected "beginning on January 1, 2015," on top of the fare (rule 82-26(h)). Rule 82-70(b) says drivers of accessible SHLs receive a per-trip payment, with the amount posted on TLC's website.

Where the $1 goes

  1. Passenger pays

    $1.00 surcharge is added to each SHL hail trip.

  2. Collected

    Through the technology system / e-hail provider, or remitted by the driver.

  3. Paid to the Fund

    The SHL Improvement Fund, managed by the City.

  4. Good to know: Paid out

    Grants to owners who must buy accessible vehicles; per-trip payments to accessible SHL drivers; training and dispatch programs.

What (g)(2) said, then and now

Rule 82-17(g)(2) in two versions of chapter 82

Row labelJanuary 2019 rule bookCurrent rule book (Feb. 2026)
HeadingStreet Hail Livery Improvement FundStreet Hail Livery Improvement Fund (TSP Responsibility)
(g)(2) textThe SHL licensee must pay the surcharge to the Fund at the time and in the manner TLC requiresFor trips in WAV vehicles, the driver incentive payment (rule 82-70(b)) is paid directly to the driver by the technology system provider and/or e-hail provider
Who is responsibleSHL licenseeTechnology system / e-hail provider for (g)(1)–(2); licensee for uncollected amounts under (g)(3)
Penalty$1,000 for (g)(1)–(3)$1,000 and suspension until compliance for (g)(1)–(5)
AppearanceRequiredRequired

In the 2019 version, (g)(1) required the licensee to pay the surcharge "remitted by the Driver for each Hail Trip," (g)(2) set the "time and manner," and (g)(3) warned that non-payment "may be grounds for suspension" and denial of renewals. In the current version, the duty to remit collected surcharges sits mainly with the technology system provider or e-hail app provider, while (g)(3) makes the SHL licensee pay amounts the provider did not collect, and (g)(5) says non-payment is grounds for suspension and denial of renewals or new licenses.

We could not find a published copy of chapter 82 for every year, so we can't say exactly when the wording changed. Your summons should describe the alleged conduct; that description is what you answer.

How often it appears

Summonses citing rule 82-17(g)(2) by year

First-listed charge on taxi/FHV summonses at OATH. All were issued by TLC. A summons is an allegation, not a finding.

Summonses

1.1K2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
2016761
201716
2018428
20191,088
2020940
20210
20220
2023289
2024169
20250

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). Total 2016–2025: 3,691; 2026 so far: 0 (incomplete year, not charted). A summons is not a finding of guilt; outcomes and fines are blank in this dataset. Before 2016 this code appears rarely or not at all (0 summonses since 2014, under 1% of the peak year), often because the rule was renumbered or adopted then.

The summonses arrive in batches: 761 in 2016, 1,088 in 2019, 940 in 2020, none in 2021–2022, then 289 in 2023 and 169 in 2024. Every one was issued by TLC itself, which fits a records-based payment review rather than a street stop.

Who it applies to

Under both versions, the summons is normally addressed to the SHL licensee, though the current version also places duties on technology system and e-hail providers. Drivers of accessible SHLs are on the receiving end of the incentive payments; see WAV drivers and green cab drivers.

What to do now

Records that answer a surcharge summons

0 of 5 done
Saved on this device only.
  • Reconcile first. Compare hail trip counts with what was collected and paid. Many disputes are about the numbers.
  • Pay what you owe if the records show a shortfall, and keep proof. Under the current rule, the suspension lasts until compliance.
  • Appear at the hearing. Appearance is required. If the provider was responsible for remitting, bring that evidence.

Hearing, payment and suspension

A surcharge case is mostly about documents, so a written defense or a phone hearing often works well. TLC's summons page says OATH hearings are generally held by phone or by written defense online if eligible; request a phone hearing at least 3 business days ahead, or an in-person hearing at least 5 business days ahead. Because appearance is required, don't simply mail a payment and assume the case is closed. Check the status with our summons lookup.

If you are found guilty, the fine is due within 30 days (rule 82-02(c)). If it isn't paid, TLC sends written notice that the license will be suspended in 10 business days until it is paid. A suspension under chapter 82 covers both the SHL license and the vehicle's for-hire or paratransit vehicle license (rule 82-02(d)). See paying TLC fines.

Points to discuss with your lawyer

General information only:

  • Which version of 82-17(g) was in force on the date in the summons?
  • Who had the duty to collect and remit: you, or your technology or e-hail provider?
  • Is the amount right? It should match the hail trips in the period.
  • Was it already paid? Payment records can resolve the case.
  • Is there a settlement? Settlement offers come from TLC, not OATH; see TLC settlement offers.

Read more about how fixed and range penalties work in the TLC penalty schedule explained, and about cooperating with TLC requests in 82-16(j)(1).

Frequently asked questions

What is the Street Hail Livery Improvement Surcharge?

A $1.00 surcharge added to every hail trip in a Street Hail Livery, collected since January 1, 2015. It goes into the City-managed Street Hail Livery Improvement Fund, which supports accessible (wheelchair) SHL vehicles and their drivers.

What did 82-17(g)(2) say?

It depends on the version. TLC's January 2019 rule book said the SHL licensee must pay the surcharge to the Fund at the time and in the manner TLC requires. The current rule book (updated February 2026) uses (g)(2) for the WAV driver incentive payment, which the technology system or e-hail provider pays directly to the driver.

What is the penalty?

Both versions list $1,000 for 82-17(g)(1)–(g)(3) or (g)(1)–(g)(5), with appearance required. The current version adds suspension until compliance.

Why are there no summonses citing it in 2025?

OATH data shows this code from 2016 to 2024, with none in 2021, 2022 or 2025. The data doesn't explain the gaps; they may reflect when TLC reconciled surcharge payments.

Sources

Last reviewed against the official sources on .

  1. TLC Rules, Chapter 82 — Street Hail Livery (current, updated Feb. 27, 2026) nyc.gov
  2. TLC Rules, Chapter 82 as posted January 28, 2019 (Internet Archive copy) web.archive.org
  3. TLC Rules, Chapter 51 — Definitions (Street Hail Livery Improvement Fund and Surcharge) nyc.gov
  4. NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) data.cityofnewyork.us

Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll check it against the official source.