Other codes: pre-1992 numbering, Admin Code shorthand and unreadable entries

Running a TLC-licensed business without the license (likely City law)

"528A" most likely means NYC Administrative Code §19-528(a): it is unlawful to run any business that needs a TLC license, such as a car-service base, without that license. The TLC can fine per day and order the premises closed or sealed. Respondents were almost all car and limousine services, and dates run 1992–1997, which fits this reading. A pre-1992 TLC code can't be fully ruled out.

NYC Admin. Code §19-528(a) (most likely)NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror; official text: American Legal Publishing)

Commuter van seized for running without TLC authorization or license

"529.2" is NYC Administrative Code §19-529.2, which lets police or TLC officers seize a van they believe is being run as a commuter van service without TLC authorization or without a commuter van license. A hearing must be held within five business days of the seizure. The 45 charges are from 2006–2007.

NYC Admin. Code §19-529.2NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror; official text: American Legal Publishing)

Acting as a taxicab agent without a TLC agent license

"530A" is NYC Administrative Code §19-530(a). It is unlawful to act as a TLC agent (someone who manages or leases out taxicabs on behalf of medallion owners) without a TLC agent license, renewed each year. All 35 charges in OATH's data are dated May 16, 1996, which suggests a single enforcement sweep.

NYC Admin. Code §19-530(a)NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror; official text: American Legal Publishing)

Probably the City unlicensed-vehicle law (digits swapped)

"560B" does not match any TLC rule or City law section. It is most likely "506B" with two digits swapped, meaning NYC Administrative Code §19-506(b): operating a vehicle for hire without the right TLC license. The single charge is dated February 1992, when "506B" was in heavy use but the TLC's older numbering was also in use, so this is a best reading only.

Most likely NYC Admin. Code §19-506(b)NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror; official text: American Legal Publishing)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (49 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 3, 1992 to Jun 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (9 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 8, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Respondents were a mix of companies and individual people. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (11 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 9, 1992 to Jun 15, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (38 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 7, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (400 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (26 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 10, 1992 to Jun 25, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jan 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Apr 8, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (82 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 6, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date May 25, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (8 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 15, 1992 to May 27, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Respondents were a mix of companies and individual people. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jun 7, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Car-service base letting drivers double-park near the base (old rule)

"607B1" is most likely old TLC Rule 6-07(b)(1) without its hyphen. It made a for-hire base owner responsible for making sure base staff and affiliated drivers did not double-park, park on the sidewalk, block driveways or hydrants, or otherwise park illegally near the base. The two charges are dated February 1998, when that rule was in force.

Replaced by §59B-18(b)

Former TLC Rule 6-07(b)(1) (most likely)Old TLC Rules, Chapter 6 (For-Hire Vehicles), 2004 archive copy

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date May 22, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (13 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 7, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (543 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (64 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 29, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (63 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 24, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (155 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 3, 1992 to Jun 29, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (956 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Mar 12, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 3, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (527 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Apr 28, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Apr 16, 1992 to May 26, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jan 4, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (5 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 22, 1992 to Apr 16, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (89 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Apr 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (6 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 15, 1992 to Jun 12, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (121 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 3, 1992 to Jun 29, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (6 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 21, 1992 to Jun 28, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (2 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 5, 1992 to May 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (2 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 28, 1992 to May 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Mar 28, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date May 11, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 19, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (7 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 24, 1992 to Mar 4, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 7, 1992 to Feb 27, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (38 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 13, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jan 13, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (8 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 15, 1992 to May 13, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 4, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, no usable violation date in OATH's data). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (6 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Mar 6, 1992 to May 21, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 13, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4 charges in OATH's data, violation dates May 6, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (2 charges in OATH's data, violation date Jan 11, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Mar 12, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (180 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 22, 1992 to Jun 17, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Aug 13, 1991 to Jun 15, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 29, 1992 to Apr 20, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (180 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Apr 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (79 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 6, 1992 to Jun 16, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Apr 22, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Apr 14, 1992 to May 27, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (47 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 6, 1992 to Jun 16, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Respondents were a mix of companies and individual people. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (382 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 4, 1992 to Apr 24, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 24, 1992 to Feb 11, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Mar 5, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Number 1835 in the charge-code field (unclear)

"1835" does not match any TLC rule we know of. It appears once, in January 1992, when the TLC still used an older numbering whose text isn't online. It may also be a record number. Look at the other charge codes and the written description on your summons to see what was actually alleged.

Not a rule numberNYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Number 1950 in the charge-code field (unclear)

"1950" does not match any TLC rule we know of. It appears once, in April 1992, when the TLC still used an older numbering whose text isn't online. It may also be a year or record number typed in by mistake. Look at the other charge codes and the written description on your summons to see what was actually alleged.

Not a rule numberNYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Number 2041 in the charge-code field (unclear)

"2041" does not clearly match a TLC rule. It could be an old taxi-driver rule (Chapter 2) typed without its hyphen, but section 2-41 was "reserved" (empty), so that reading doesn't work. One Port Authority entry with no usable date. Look at the other charge codes and the written description on your summons to see what was actually alleged.

Not a rule numberNYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Taxi driver picking up passengers while off duty (old rule)

"2053A" is most likely old TLC Rule 2-53(a), written without the hyphen and with an extra zero. Under that rule a taxi driver with the "Off Duty" light on could not look for or accept a passenger unless heading back to the garage or home, with the trip noted, and the passenger's destination directly on the way. The single charge is dated December 1997, when that rule was in force. Today the same limit is in the Chapter 80 rule for drivers logged off the taxi's technology system.

Replaced by §80-19(A)(5) — Picking up while logged off without the going-home exception

Former TLC Rule 2-53(a) (most likely)Old TLC Rules, Chapter 2 (Taxicab Drivers)

Code 2066B: possibly old rule 2-66(b) (cooperating with the TLC)

"2066B" could be old TLC Rule 2-66(b) written without the hyphen and with an extra zero. That rule required a taxi driver to promptly answer and follow TLC questions, directives and summonses, and to produce licenses and trip records when asked. But the single charge is dated May 1992, before the hyphenated old-chapter numbering came into use, so it may instead be a code from the TLC's earlier numbering, whose text is not online. Check the written description on your summons.

Possibly former TLC Rule 2-66(b)Old TLC Rules, Chapter 2 (Taxicab Drivers)

Number 2130 in the charge-code field (unclear)

"2130" does not clearly match a TLC rule. It might be an old taxi-driver rule (Chapter 2, such as 2-13) typed without its hyphen, or a code from the numbering used before mid-1992. One entry, April 1992. Look at the other charge codes and the written description on your summons to see what was actually alleged.

Not a rule numberNYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Probably the City unlicensed-vehicle law (written with an extra 6)

"5066B" is almost certainly "506B" typed with an extra 6: NYC Administrative Code §19-506(b), operating or letting someone operate a vehicle for hire without the right TLC license. The two charges are from a March 2013 hearing. This is a best reading of a mistyped code.

Most likely NYC Admin. Code §19-506(b)NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror; official text: American Legal Publishing)

Number 6687 in the charge-code field (not a known rule)

"6687" does not match any TLC rule or City law section we know of. It may be a record number or a mistyped code. One entry, November 2000. Look at the other charge codes and the written description on your summons to see what was actually alleged.

Not a rule numberNYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Operating a vehicle for hire without a TLC vehicle license — another spelling of §19-506(B)(1) (Operating a vehicle for hire without a TLC vehicle license).

Operating a vehicle for hire without the right TLC license (City law) — another spelling of §506B (Operating a vehicle for hire without the right TLC license (City law)).

Unlicensed for-hire vehicle and illegal taxi or livery markings, cited together — another spelling of §506B/C (Unlicensed for-hire vehicle and illegal taxi or livery markings, cited together).

Operating a vehicle for hire without a TLC vehicle license — another spelling of §19-506(B)(1) (Operating a vehicle for hire without a TLC vehicle license).

Taxi or livery signs, or advertising a car service, without TLC licenses — another spelling of §506C (Taxi or livery signs, or advertising a car service, without TLC licenses).

Driving a TLC-licensed vehicle for hire without a TLC driver license — another spelling of §506D (Driving a TLC-licensed vehicle for hire without a TLC driver license).