Other codes: pre-1992 numbering, Admin Code shorthand and unreadable entries

Garbled charge code (ampersand and a number)

This entry is an ampersand followed by the number 2, which looks like a typing error or a note such as 'and 2 more'. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Dec 1997. Written by TLC inspectors. It was charged together with 2-56C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

A period instead of a charge code

This entry is just a period, typed where a charge code should be. It was most often written next to real pre-1992 codes such as 106C, 0213 or 0204, so it probably marks an empty or unreadable charge line. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 521 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Nov 29, 2000. Most were written by Port Authority police (for example at the airports). It was often charged together with 106C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled charge code (dots and a number)

This entry is three dots and the number 1, which looks like a typing error. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, both from January 1992, on a summons that also listed 201B, 506B, 506C and 19 (most likely an unlicensed for-hire vehicle case). Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It may be code 106C with the first digit typed as a period. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

All zeros instead of a charge code

This entry is two zeros, which looks like a placeholder typed when the charge code was missing. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jan 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

All zeros instead of a charge code

This entry is all zeros, which looks like a placeholder typed when the charge code was missing or unreadable. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 8 charges, with violation dates between Feb 28, 1992 and Jun 29, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. It was often charged together with 0105, 0603, 312A and 312G. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

All zeros instead of a charge code

This entry is all zeros, which looks like a placeholder typed when the charge code was missing or unreadable. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 315 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 28, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. It was often charged together with 106C and 211A. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

All zeros instead of a charge code

This entry is all zeros, which looks like a placeholder typed when the charge code was missing or unreadable. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 6 charges, with violation dates between Feb 28, 1992 and Jun 24, 1992. Written by Port Authority police and TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 2-66A. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

A single number instead of a charge code

This entry is just the number 1. It may be a count or a cut-off code; in 1998 the TLC used old chapter 1 for taxicab owner rules, but without a section number we cannot tell which rule. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1998. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Taxicab air conditioning missing or not working — another spelling of §1-14A (Taxicab air conditioning missing or not working).

Owner did not answer or comply with TLC directives or summonses — another spelling of §1-68A (Owner did not answer or comply with TLC directives or summonses).

Garbled charge code

This entry (1E67, dated 1997) mixes digits and a letter in a way no TLC rule uses; it may be a mistyped old owner rule (chapter 1), but we cannot tell which. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Sep 1997. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Not turning the air conditioning on or off when asked — another spelling of §2-46D (Not turning the air conditioning on or off when asked).

Garbled charge code

This entry (4Y67, dated 1998) mixes digits and a letter in a way no TLC rule uses; it cannot be matched to a rule. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in May 1998. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

A single number instead of a charge code

This entry is just the number 6, dated March 1992. It may be a cut-off code; it cannot be matched to a rule. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates in Mar 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge. Written by Port Authority police. It was charged together with 2041, 2130 and 0230, in April 1992. It may be code 106A with the first digit missing. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It does not match the usual shape of these codes and may be a typing error. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It was charged together with 6B50 and 1950. It may be code 106C with digits missing. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

A single number instead of a charge code

This entry is just the number 7, dated 1997. Old TLC chapter 7 covered representatives at TLC hearings, but a lone number cannot be matched to a rule. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Dec 1997. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

A single number instead of a charge code

This entry is just the number 9, dated early 1992. It may be a cut-off code; it cannot be matched to a rule. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Mar 31, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It was charged together with 0406. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Likely shorthand for NYC Admin. Code Title 19 (TLC law)

This code is just the number 19. It was usually charged together with 506B, 506C or 506D, which are §19-506 of the NYC Administrative Code (unlicensed for-hire activity), so it most likely stands for a Title 19 law section whose number was cut off, probably §19-506. Title 19, Chapter 5 is the city law that licenses taxis and for-hire vehicles and sets penalties for operating without a license. OATH's public records show it on 129 charges, with violation dates between Jan 10, 1992 and Apr 18, 2014.

NYC Admin. Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (section number cut off; most likely §19-506)NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 (readable mirror)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It may be a garbled form of code 201B. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It may be a 4-digit code such as 0211 with the last digit mistyped. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It may be a 4-digit code (such as 0220–0229) with a digit missing. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Unrecognized 4-digit code

This entry (0032, dated 2000) does not fit any TLC numbering in use at the time, and it is outside the 0101–0418 range of the pre-1992 codes. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Dec 2000. Written by Port Authority police. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates in Mar 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Garbled pre-1992 TLC charge code, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It does not match the usual shape of these codes and may be a typing error. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Taxi or green cab driver rule (section not recorded)

Only the chapter number, 54, was recorded for this charge. Chapter 54 held the rules for drivers of yellow taxis and green street hail liveries from April 2011 until October 25, 2016, when it was replaced by Chapter 80 (rules for all TLC drivers). It covered licensing, conduct, traffic safety, fares, refusals and required items. Without the section number we cannot say which rule was charged.

Replaced by §80

Former 35 RCNY Chapter 54TLC Rule Book, former Chapter 54 (Drivers of Taxicabs and Street Hail Liveries)

Taxicab Improvement Fund surcharge not paid in — another spelling of §58-16(F) (Required taxi fund not paid (Accessibility Fee, now Improvement Surcharge)).

Two FHV licenses on one vehicle: hearing and revocation (former rule)

Under the 2011 version of the for-hire vehicle owner rules, §59A-04(j)(2) covered what happened when someone applied to license a vehicle (by VIN) that already had a valid FHV license held by another person: TLC would hold a hearing on the existing holder's fitness, and would revoke that license unless the holder showed it had been moved to a new vehicle. The current rule book keeps only the one-license-per-vehicle rule in §59A-04(j).

Former 35 RCNY §59A-04(j)(2)TLC Rule Book, Chapter 59 (2011 edition, archived)

Existing FHV license revoked when another owner licenses the same vehicle — another spelling of §59A-04(J)(2)(II) (Existing FHV license revoked when another owner licenses the same vehicle).

Existing FHV license revoked when another owner licenses the same vehicle — another spelling of §59A-04(J)(2)(II) (Existing FHV license revoked when another owner licenses the same vehicle).

FHV operating rules: trips by pre-arrangement only — another spelling of §59A-25 (FHV operating rules: trips by pre-arrangement only).

FHV owner allowed trips that were not pre-arranged — another spelling of §59A-25(A) (FHV owner allowed trips that were not pre-arranged).

Base did not keep or show required records — another spelling of §59B-19(B) (Base did not keep or show required records).

For-hire vehicle owner rule (section not recorded)

Only the sub-chapter, 59A, was recorded for this charge, not the section. Sub-chapter 59A of the TLC rules covers owners of for-hire vehicles (liveries, black cars, limousines): licensing, insurance, inspections, required items in the vehicle and trips by pre-arrangement only. Without the section number we cannot say which rule was charged; the summons itself will say.

35 RCNY Chapter 59, Sub-chapter 59ATLC Rule Book, Chapter 59 (Sub-chapter 59A: For-Hire Vehicle Owners)

For-hire vehicle owner rule with the section number missing

This code names Sub-chapter 59A (for-hire vehicle owners) and a subparagraph (a)(3)(ii), but the section number is missing. Given the 2015 dates, it is most likely §59A-30(a)(3)(ii): a black car or luxury limousine must display the driver's TLC license so it is clearly visible from the passenger seat and can be inspected on request. Other 59A sections also have an (a)(3)(ii), such as §59A-05(a)(3)(ii), so this reading is not certain.

35 RCNY Sub-chapter 59A (section number missing; most likely §59A-30(a)(3)(ii))TLC Rule Book, Chapter 59 (Sub-chapter 59A: For-Hire Vehicle Owners)

Unrecognized 4-digit code

This entry (0096, dated 1993) does not fit any TLC numbering in use at the time, and it is outside the 0101–0418 range of the pre-1992 codes. It does not match any TLC rule or law section, so there is no rule text to explain. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Aug 1993. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

Not a rule number (data-entry placeholder or typo)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 62 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 8 charges, with violation dates in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 26 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 25, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 15 charges, with violation dates between Jan 16, 1992 and Jun 18, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 0204. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 163 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 89 charges, with violation dates between Jan 7, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 7 charges, with violation dates between Jan 11, 1992 and May 23, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1,033 charges, with violation dates between May 8, 1991 and Jun 30, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. It was often charged together with 0204. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 30 charges, with violation dates between Jan 16, 1992 and Jun 29, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. It was often charged together with 603 and 204. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jan 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 30 charges, with violation dates between Jan 15, 1992 and Jun 25, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 211A. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 7 charges, with violation dates between Jan 12, 1992 and Jun 21, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 507 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 106C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (mostly Port Authority summonses)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 130 charges, with violation dates between Jan 8, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Most were written by Port Authority police (for example at the airports). The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 106A and 106C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3,742 charges, with violation dates almost all between Jan 1, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992 (a few later dates look like entry errors). Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (mostly Port Authority summonses)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 31 charges, with violation dates between Feb 4, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Most were written by Port Authority police (for example at the airports). The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 106A and 106B. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Jan 16, 1992 and Apr 2, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 225 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 29, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 187 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 26, 1992. They were written by both TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (mostly Port Authority summonses)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 5 charges, with violation dates between Feb 21, 1992 and Jun 26, 1992. Most were written by Port Authority police (for example at the airports). Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates between Jan 3, 1992 and Apr 29, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 7 charges, with violation dates between Feb 9, 1992 and Jun 1, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 6 charges, with violation dates between Jan 10, 1992 and Jun 24, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Jan 28, 1992 and Feb 26, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors and Port Authority police. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 76 charges, with violation dates between Jan 8, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates in Mar 1992. Written by Port Authority police. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 5 charges, with violation dates between Feb 26, 1992 and Jun 17, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 35 charges, with violation dates between Jan 10, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 14 charges, with violation dates in May 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Apr 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 101 charges, with violation dates between Jan 3, 1992 and Jun 26, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 5 charges, with violation dates in May 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 19-505. Related codes 201A, 201B and 201D also appear; 201B was the most common. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge. Written by TLC inspectors. It looks like code 201 with a stray period. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It looks like another spelling of a sub-part of code 201B. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 15 charges, with violation dates between Jan 26, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 19-505. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)