Other codes: pre-1992 numbering, Admin Code shorthand and unreadable entries

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates between Jan 17, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 82 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 25, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 8 charges, with violation dates between Feb 18, 1992 and Apr 29, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online — another spelling of §304B (Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)).

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online — another spelling of §304C (Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)).

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 281 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 512 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 304C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 463 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 304B. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 4 charges, with violation dates between Jan 4, 1992 and Mar 22, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Mar 20, 1992 and May 20, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 319 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 5 charges, with violation dates in Jun 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 106C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates between Feb 25, 1992 and Mar 11, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates between Feb 7, 1992 and Mar 12, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 10 charges, with violation dates between Jan 11, 1992 and Jun 12, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 5 charges, with violation dates between Jan 11, 1992 and Jun 29, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 56 charges, with violation dates between Jan 10, 1992 and Jun 27, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 312 charges, with violation dates between Jan 8, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. It was often charged together with 0301. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 6 charges, with violation dates between Mar 27, 1991 and Feb 18, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 301. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely a driver rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 53 charges, with violation dates between Jan 4, 1992 and Jun 26, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. The respondents were almost all individual people, which suggests a rule aimed at drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Feb 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Apr 7, 1992 and Jun 4, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 150 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 312G and 0321. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jan 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 68 charges, with violation dates almost all between Jan 14, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992 (a few later dates look like entry errors). Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 506B and 506C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Jan 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 34 charges, with violation dates between Jan 6, 1992 and Jun 25, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. It was often charged together with 312F and 312A. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 23 charges, with violation dates between Jan 17, 1992 and Jun 24, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. It was often charged together with 312E. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 119 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 312A and 0321. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 4 charges, with violation dates between Feb 26, 1992 and Jun 1, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 41 charges, with violation dates between Feb 20, 1992 and May 27, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 312A and 312G. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Two pre-1992 TLC charges written together, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. The officer wrote two sub-parts of code 315 (A and C) in one entry; see 315A and 315C. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Several pre-1992 TLC charges written together, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge. Written by TLC inspectors. The officer wrote four sub-parts of code 315 (A to D) in one entry; see 315A–315D. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (often in unlicensed-vehicle cases)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2,483 charges, with violation dates between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was usually charged together with 506B/506C/506D (NYC Admin. Code §19-506, unlicensed for-hire activity), so it was most likely part of an unlicensed-vehicle case. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3 charges, with violation dates between Jan 13, 1992 and Apr 21, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 4 charges, with violation dates in May 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 68 charges, with violation dates between Jan 26, 1992 and Jun 19, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. It was often charged together with 312A and 312G. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 19 charges, with violation dates between May 1, 1992 and Jun 16, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. It was often charged together with 312A and 312G. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 18 charges, with violation dates between Jan 6, 1992 and Jun 5, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 2 charges, with violation dates between Mar 18, 1992 and May 28, 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 9 charges, with violation dates between Mar 9, 1992 and May 29, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 1 charge, with a violation date in Mar 1992. Written by TLC inspectors. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 14 charges, with violation dates between Jan 4, 1992 and May 27, 1992. Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC charge, rule text not online (likely an owner rule)

This code comes from the TLC's rule numbering used before mid-1992. The text of that rule is not available online (not on nyc.gov or in web archives), so we cannot say exactly what it covered. OATH's public records show it on 3,239 charges, with violation dates almost all between Jan 2, 1992 and Jun 30, 1992 (a few later dates look like entry errors). Almost all were written by TLC inspectors. Many respondents were companies, which suggests a rule aimed at vehicle owners or businesses rather than drivers. Your summons or hearing decision describes the specific conduct.

TLC rule numbering used before mid-1992 (text not available)TLC – Old Rule Book Chapters (nyc.gov)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4,271 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Apr 15, 2006). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide. A few later dates in the data are likely entry errors.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (19 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 10, 1992 to Jun 19, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (90 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (13 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 24, 1992 to Jun 23, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (9 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 24, 1992 to Apr 7, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (4 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 30, 1992 to Apr 23, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (8 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to May 16, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (44 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 4, 1992 to Jun 10, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (13 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 24, 1992 to Jun 17, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (5 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 26, 1992 to Jun 28, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Jun 23, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (518 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 1, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (256 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (63 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 4, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1,163 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (43 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 18, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (34 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Apr 6, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (53 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 5, 1992 to Jun 19, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, no usable violation date in OATH's data). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 18, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (978 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (10 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 3, 1992 to May 25, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (12 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 18, 1992 to Jun 8, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (6 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Feb 11, 1992 to Mar 11, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (1 charge in OATH's data, violation date Feb 14, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to vehicle owners (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (646 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Most respondents were companies (many with "taxi", "cab" or "hacking" in their names), so it was most likely a rule for vehicle owners, not drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 30, 1992 to Jun 2, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (181 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 16, 1992 to Jun 15, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule, mostly charged to drivers (text not online)

This four-digit code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (769 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 2, 1992 to Jun 30, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. Almost every respondent was an individual person, so it was most likely a rule for drivers. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)

Pre-1992 TLC rule (text not online)

This code comes from the TLC's numbering used before mid-1992 (3 charges in OATH's data, violation dates Jan 21, 1992 to Jun 2, 1992). The text of that rule is not available online, so we can't say exactly what it covered. There are too few cases to tell whether it applied to drivers or to vehicle owners. The written description on your summons is the best guide.

TLC numbering before mid-1992 (text not available)NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (charge records)