Data & statisticsEnforcement & unlicensed activity

Most Common TLC Violations: Top 15 Codes at OATH

The 15 rule codes that appear most on TLC summonses (2021–2025), decoded in plain English with points, trends by year and the limits of the OATH data.

  • Reviewed
  • 3 min read
  • 5 official sources

Data used

On this page (9)
  1. The top 15 at a glance
  2. What each code means
  3. The number one code over time
  4. Stop signs: a spike, then a fall
  5. Phone summonses have dropped sharply
  6. The top owner code: missed FHV inspections
  7. What this data can and cannot tell you
  8. FAQ
  9. Sources

In short: The single most common TLC charge is 80-13(a)(2), a non-hazardous moving traffic violation. It was the first charge on 53,599 taxi/FHV summonses dated 2021–2025, about one in six. Close behind are stop sign and red light summonses, then a group of owner rules for for-hire vehicles, such as missed inspections. The 15 codes below cover about 73% of all summonses in that window.

The ranking comes from the OATH Hearings Division Case Status dataset on NYC Open Data. Each code's meaning comes from the TLC rule books or the NYC Administrative Code, linked in the sources.

The top 15 at a glance

Most common first charges on taxi/FHV summonses, 2021–2025

All issuing agencies. First-listed charge only. 1,484 summonses in the window have no code.

  1. 80-13(a)(2)53,599
  2. 80-13(a)(3)(viii)37,544
  3. 59A-26(a)(1)21,078
  4. 80-13(a)(3)(vii)20,561
  5. 59A-13(j)(1)19,486
  6. 80-13(a)(1)15,315
  7. 19-506(b)(1)12,808
  8. 58-29(b)10,356
  9. 59A-27(d)9,071
  10. 80-13(a)(3)(i)(b)5,308
  11. 19-504(g)5,031
  12. 80-24(a)(2)4,929
  13. 80-14(g)(1)4,799
  14. 59A-27(e)4,061
  15. 80-14(f)(2)4,060
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
80-13(a)(2)53,599
80-13(a)(3)(viii)37,544
59A-26(a)(1)21,078
80-13(a)(3)(vii)20,561
59A-13(j)(1)19,486
80-13(a)(1)15,315
19-506(b)(1)12,808
58-29(b)10,356
59A-27(d)9,071
80-13(a)(3)(i)(b)5,308
19-504(g)5,031
80-24(a)(2)4,929
80-14(g)(1)4,799
59A-27(e)4,061
80-14(f)(2)4,060

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts are summonses filed at OATH by the agency, dated by violation_date (the date on the summons). A summons is not a finding of guilt. hearing_status, hearing_result, penalty_imposed, paid_amount and the charge descriptions are blank for taxi rows in this dataset, so it cannot show outcomes or fines. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). 1,484 summonses in this window have no charge code. Look up each code's meaning in the TLC rules before describing it.

What each code means

The top 15 codes, decoded

#CodeWhat it coversAimed atSummonses 2021–25
180-13(a)(2)Moving traffic violation that is not on the 'hazardous' listDriver53,599
280-13(a)(3)(viii)Stop sign violation (hazardous, 3 TLC points)Driver37,544
359A-26(a)(1)For-hire vehicle not inspected as requiredFHV owner21,078
480-13(a)(3)(vii)Traffic signal (red light) violation (hazardous, 3 points)Driver20,561
559A-13(j)(1)Not complying with TLC directives, communications or summonsesFHV owner19,486
680-13(a)(1)Parking, standing or stopping (stationary vehicle) violationDriver15,315
719-506(b)(1)Operating or offering a vehicle for hire without a TLC vehicle licenseDriver or owner12,808
858-29(b)Taxicab not inspected on its every-four-months scheduleMedallion owner10,356
959A-27(d)Not following a TLC notice to correct a vehicle defectFHV owner9,071
1080-13(a)(3)(i)(B)Speeding 11–20 mph over the limit (hazardous, 4 points)Driver5,308
1119-504(g)Vehicle license revocation for nonuse (vehicle not operated for 60 days)Vehicle owner5,031
1280-24(a)(2)TLC driver license not displayed in a for-hire vehicleDriver4,929
1380-14(g)(1)Using a phone or tablet while drivingDriver4,799
1459A-27(e)No daily safety check of the vehicle by the ownerFHV owner4,061
1580-14(f)(2)Carrying passengers more than 10 hours in 24 hoursDriver4,060

A few patterns are worth knowing:

  • Ten of the 15 are aimed at the driver. They come from chapter 80, TLC's driver rules. Five of those are traffic rules under 80-13, which add a TLC penalty on top of the normal traffic law.
  • Owner rules are a big share. Codes starting with 59A apply to for-hire vehicle owners, and 58 to medallion taxi owners. If you own and drive your own car, these summonses come to you as the owner. See TLC vehicle owner summons statistics.
  • Codes starting with 19- are city law, not TLC rules. They come from Title 19 of the NYC Administrative Code and cover licensing and unlicensed activity. See unlicensed activity summons statistics.

The number one code over time

Summonses citing 80-13(a)(2) by year

First-listed charge, all agencies. The code barely appears before 2016, when TLC's current chapter 80 numbering came in. 2026 so far: 2,648.

Summonses

12K2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
2016977
20179,771
20188,488
201910,383
20203,906
20219,855
202211,662
202311,190
202412,174
20258,718

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). Total 2016–2025: 87,124; 2026 so far: 2,648 (incomplete year, not charted). A summons is not a finding of guilt; outcomes and fines are blank in this dataset. Before 2016 this code appears rarely or not at all (0 summonses since 2014, under 1% of the peak year), often because the rule was renumbered or adopted then.

Rule 80-13(a)(2) covers moving violations that are not on the hazardous list in 80-13(a)(3). The first violation brings a fine only. A second within 15 months adds 1 TLC point. A third adds a point and a suspension that is deferred for 60 days and avoided if you finish a Vision Zero and Accessibility Remedial course in that time (chapter 80). Port Authority Police wrote 11,971 of these summonses in 2021–2025, about a fifth of the total, so this code is also a major airport-area charge.

Stop signs: a spike, then a fall

Summonses citing 80-13(a)(3)(viii) (stop sign) by year

First-listed charge, all agencies. 2026 so far: 944.

Summonses

12K2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
2016152
20172,357
20182,544
20196,576
20202,961
202111,656
202210,933
20236,338
20244,213
20254,404

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). Total 2016–2025: 52,134; 2026 so far: 944 (incomplete year, not charted). A summons is not a finding of guilt; outcomes and fines are blank in this dataset. Before 2016 this code appears rarely or not at all (0 summonses since 2014, under 1% of the peak year), often because the rule was renumbered or adopted then.

Stop sign summonses jumped to 11,656 in 2021 and 10,933 in 2022, then fell back to about 4,400 by 2025. The data can't say why. It may reflect where and how enforcement was focused in those years. It does not show that drivers ran more stop signs. Each one carries 3 TLC points, which count toward the Persistent Violator Program.

Phone summonses have dropped sharply

Summonses citing 80-14(g)(1) (phone use while driving) by year

First-listed charge, all agencies. 2026 so far: 198.

Summonses

7.8K2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
20161,193
20177,848
20186,570
20196,118
20201,026
20211,512
2022836
2023952
2024876
2025623

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). Total 2016–2025: 27,554; 2026 so far: 198 (incomplete year, not charted). A summons is not a finding of guilt; outcomes and fines are blank in this dataset. Before 2016 this code appears rarely or not at all (1 summonses since 2014, under 1% of the peak year), often because the rule was renumbered or adopted then.

Rule 80-14(g)(1) summonses peaked at 7,848 in 2017 and have been under 1,000 a year since 2022. Again, fewer summonses means less enforcement under this code. It is not proof of less phone use. The rule still allows phone use only while the vehicle is lawfully standing or parked, and a finding brings a suspension unless you complete a distracted-driving course within 60 days. More in our cell phone rule guide.

The top owner code: missed FHV inspections

Summonses citing 59A-26(a)(1) (FHV inspection) by year

First-listed charge, all agencies. Peak in 2021 (6,187). 2026 so far: 1,366.

Summonses

6.2K201720182019202020212022202320242025
Show data table
LabelSummonses (summonses)
2017342
20181,964
20192,821
20204,146
20216,187
20224,124
20233,760
20243,907
20253,100

Source: NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) · Data as of Oct 12, 2026. Counts use the first-listed charge (charge_1_code) only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first code, so they are not counted. Codes are normalised for case (80-13(A)(2) and 80-13(a)(2) are the same). Total 2017–2025: 30,351; 2026 so far: 1,366 (incomplete year, not charted). A summons is not a finding of guilt; outcomes and fines are blank in this dataset. Before 2017 this code appears rarely or not at all (0 summonses since 2014, under 1% of the peak year), often because the rule was renumbered or adopted then.

Under 59A-26(a), a for-hire vehicle owner faces a $100 fine and a suspension of the vehicle license until the vehicle passes inspection (chapter 59). Appearance is required. If you drive a car you also own, keep an eye on inspection dates; our TLC vehicle inspection guide explains the schedule.

What this data can and cannot tell you

It can tell you which codes TLC and the Port Authority Police use most, and how each code's use has changed year by year.

It cannot tell you:

  • How often each charge is dismissed or what fine was imposed. Those fields are blank for taxi rows.
  • Your personal risk. Counts reflect where inspectors and police focus, as well as what drivers do.
  • Every charge on a summons. We rank by the first charge only. Later charge columns mostly repeat the first.
  • The meaning of older codes. Codes such as 1-11A or 2-21B come from older numbering systems. We don't guess what they mean.

Codes also change. TLC moved driver rules from chapters 54 and 55 into chapter 80 around 2016, which is why the chapter 80 codes start then. See TLC summonses by year for that history.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most common TLC violation?

In OATH's data for violations dated 2021–2025, the most common first charge is rule 80-13(a)(2), a non-hazardous moving traffic violation, with 53,599 summonses. Stop sign summonses under 80-13(a)(3)(viii) come second with 37,544.

Are most TLC summonses about driving?

The largest group is. Chapter 80 driver rules made up about 53% of first charges in 2025. About a quarter were chapter 59A rules aimed at for-hire vehicle owners, such as missed inspections.

Does a common code mean I will probably win or lose?

No. The OATH dataset leaves outcomes blank for taxi cases, so it cannot show how often any code is dismissed. Your result depends on the evidence in your own case.

Why does my summons list the same code twice?

In OATH's data the second charge usually repeats the first (about 87% of recent summonses). That is a quirk of how the summonses are recorded; ask OATH or your representative if you are unsure how many charges you face.

Which of these codes add TLC points?

Under TLC rule 80-13, hazardous traffic violations such as stop sign and red light carry 3 points, and speeding 11–20 mph over carries 4. Non-hazardous moving and parking violations add 1 point only from the second violation within 15 months.

Sources

Last reviewed against the official sources on .

  1. NYC Open Data: OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi) data.cityofnewyork.us
  2. TLC Rules, Chapter 80: Drivers nyc.gov
  3. TLC Rules, Chapter 59: For-Hire Vehicles nyc.gov
  4. TLC Rules, Chapter 58: Taxicab Owners nyc.gov
  5. NYC Administrative Code Title 19, Chapter 5 nycadmincode.readthedocs.io

Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll check it against the official source.